Testing evaluation - email | Houston Methodist

Professional Category *

Registered Nurse

Other Research Healthcare Professional

Nursing Learning Outcome *

At the completion of this activity the RN will be able to describe rules and regulations around the consenting process, as evidenced by self-reported achievement on the evaluation.

1.1 Were the Nursing Outcomes Met? *

yes

No

Speaker Evaluations *

Speaker Evaluations; Please rate the speakers based on the following scale: 5 = Outstanding, 4 = Good, 3 = Satisfactory, 2 = Fair, 1= Poor

	5	4	3	2	1
Knowledge of Subject Matter	Knowledge of Subject Matter - 5	Knowledge of Subject Matter - 4	Knowledge of Subject Matter - 3	Knowledge of Subject Matter - 2	Knowledge of Subject Matter - 1
Appropriateness of Teaching Method	Appropriateness of Teaching Method - 5	Appropriateness of Teaching Method - 4	Appropriateness of Teaching Method - 3	Appropriateness of Teaching Method - 2	Appropriateness of Teaching Method - 1

Knowledge of Subject Matter: *

Knowledge of Subject Matter:

Appropriateness of Teaching Method:

Commercial Bias? *

Was the activity free of commercial bias? [Commercial bias is defined as information presented in a manner that attempts to sway participants' opinions in favor of a particular commercial product for the express purpose of furthering a commercial entity's business.]

Yes

No

Yes Commercial Bias *

3.1 If bias detected please explain:

4 *

Did the information presented reinforce and /or improve your current skills?

Yes

Somewhat

No

5 *

Did you learn anything form this activity that you could implement in your clinical practices?

Yes

No

5.1 *

Describe how these changes may impact performance improvement or patient outcomes:

5.2 *

If you were not able to incorporate any information learned, what are the barriers that prevent implementing a change in practice?

5.3 *

Describe any potential educational interventions that could be applied to overcome these barriers.

6. Activity Environment *

Please rate based on the following scale: 5 = Outstanding, 4 = Good, 3 = Satisfactory, 2 = Fair, 1= Poor

	5	4	3	2	1
Webinar format was conducive to learning	Webinar format was conducive to learning - 5	Webinar format was conducive to learning - 4	Webinar format was conducive to learning - 3	Webinar format was conducive to learning - 2	Webinar format was conducive to learning - 1
Audiovisual Quality	Audiovisual Quality - 5	Audiovisual Quality - 4	Audiovisual Quality - 3	Audiovisual Quality - 2	Audiovisual Quality - 1

Environment

Comments Webinar format was conducive to learning:

Quality

Comments Audiovisual Quality:

7 *

The overall organization/Quality was?

8 *

If this or a similar activity is held again, what related topics would you like to be offered?

9 *

One a scale of 1-10; how likely is it that you would recommend this activity to a friend or colleague?

10 *

One a scale of 1-10; please rate your overall satisfaction of this activity.

Additional Comments

Additional Comments:

You are here

Testing evaluation - email