Evaluation - The George and Angelina Kostas Research Center for Cardiovascular Nanomedicine Symposium and 8th Annual Cardiovascular Bioengineering Symposium

Please help improve our educational activities by providing us with feedback. Thank you for your feedback and participation.

Attendance Method

Please select the method you chose to attend this activity

Live/In-person

Livestream

Professional Category Other...

Was the learning outcome met? *

Upon completion of this activity, Registered Nurses will state an increase in knowledge related to the disease process, diagnosis, or treatment options for amyloidosis as stated on the post-activity evaluation tool.

Yes

No

Please state at least 1 new learning that you will apply to your practice based on today’s conference.

How well were you able to achieve the below learning objectives? *

	Completely	Almost Completely	Somewhat	Not at All
Identify novel approaches to cardiovascular regeneration	Identify novel approaches to cardiovascular regeneration - Completely	Identify novel approaches to cardiovascular regeneration - Almost Completely	Identify novel approaches to cardiovascular regeneration - Somewhat	Identify novel approaches to cardiovascular regeneration - Not at All
Define molecular pathways in cell fate	Define molecular pathways in cell fate - Completely	Define molecular pathways in cell fate - Almost Completely	Define molecular pathways in cell fate - Somewhat	Define molecular pathways in cell fate - Not at All
Enumerate methodologies in genome editing	Enumerate methodologies in genome editing - Completely	Enumerate methodologies in genome editing - Almost Completely	Enumerate methodologies in genome editing - Somewhat	Enumerate methodologies in genome editing - Not at All

Please rate the following statements: *

	Strongly Agree	Agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The content was clearly organized.	The content was clearly organized. - Strongly Agree	The content was clearly organized. - Agree	The content was clearly organized. - Neutral	The content was clearly organized. - Disagree	The content was clearly organized. - Strongly Disagree
The speaker(s) were knowledgeable.	The speaker(s) were knowledgeable. - Strongly Agree	The speaker(s) were knowledgeable. - Agree	The speaker(s) were knowledgeable. - Neutral	The speaker(s) were knowledgeable. - Disagree	The speaker(s) were knowledgeable. - Strongly Disagree
Participation in this activity increased my professional competence.	Participation in this activity increased my professional competence. - Strongly Agree	Participation in this activity increased my professional competence. - Agree	Participation in this activity increased my professional competence. - Neutral	Participation in this activity increased my professional competence. - Disagree	Participation in this activity increased my professional competence. - Strongly Disagree
Participation in this activity will improve my performance skills in my practice setting.	Participation in this activity will improve my performance skills in my practice setting. - Strongly Agree	Participation in this activity will improve my performance skills in my practice setting. - Agree	Participation in this activity will improve my performance skills in my practice setting. - Neutral	Participation in this activity will improve my performance skills in my practice setting. - Disagree	Participation in this activity will improve my performance skills in my practice setting. - Strongly Disagree
Participation in this activity will assist in the improvement of my patient outcomes.	Participation in this activity will assist in the improvement of my patient outcomes. - Strongly Agree	Participation in this activity will assist in the improvement of my patient outcomes. - Agree	Participation in this activity will assist in the improvement of my patient outcomes. - Neutral	Participation in this activity will assist in the improvement of my patient outcomes. - Disagree	Participation in this activity will assist in the improvement of my patient outcomes. - Strongly Disagree
The educational design and format of this activity facilitated my learning.	The educational design and format of this activity facilitated my learning. - Strongly Agree	The educational design and format of this activity facilitated my learning. - Agree	The educational design and format of this activity facilitated my learning. - Neutral	The educational design and format of this activity facilitated my learning. - Disagree	The educational design and format of this activity facilitated my learning. - Strongly Disagree

As a result of this activity, do you intend to make any changes to your professional practice/performance? *

Yes

No

If no, why not? *

If yes, please describe a change or changes you plan to implement based on what you have learned in this activity. *

Follow through with your commitment to change by completing the optional CTC form at the end of the course after credit and certificate redemption.

What is your level of commitment to making the changes stated above? *

How may we help you overcome your indicated barriers?

Was the content was fair, balanced, and free of commercial bias? *

Yes

No

Please describe who or what was unfair, unbalanced, or biased. *

Based on today's activity, please list additional learning needs that you might have.

Please rate each aspect of the meeting *

	Excellent	Very Good	Good	Fair	Poor
Content	Content - Excellent	Content - Very Good	Content - Good	Content - Fair	Content - Poor
Speakers	Speakers - Excellent	Speakers - Very Good	Speakers - Good	Speakers - Fair	Speakers - Poor
Social activities	Social activities - Excellent	Social activities - Very Good	Social activities - Good	Social activities - Fair	Social activities - Poor
Conference Format	Conference Format - Excellent	Conference Format - Very Good	Conference Format - Good	Conference Format - Fair	Conference Format - Poor
Logistics	Logistics - Excellent	Logistics - Very Good	Logistics - Good	Logistics - Fair	Logistics - Poor
Support staff	Support staff - Excellent	Support staff - Very Good	Support staff - Good	Support staff - Fair	Support staff - Poor

Please include any additional comments/suggestions you may have.

You are here

Evaluation - The George and Angelina Kostas Research Center for Cardiovascular Nanomedicine Symposium and 8th Annual Cardiovascular Bioengineering Symposium